Edward French
Assessing Vulnerability and Resilience in Maine Fishing Communities
This project developed a participatory, place-based approach for assessing the vulnerability and resilience of Maine fishing communities, documenting threats and resources available to respond to those threats. To understand the forces driving vulnerability, Johnson and graduate students Cameron Thompson and Anna Henry worked with community stakeholders to identify opportunities and strategies for improving resilience of fishing communities. They produced a summary report entitled, “In Their Own Words: Fishermen’s Perspectives of Community Resilience.” Once upon a time, Maine fishermen and women harvested a diversity of species, from groundfish and herring to lobsters, clams, shrimp, and scallops, depending on market conditions and resource abundance. Today, Maine’s fishing culture is concentrated in 50 coastal communities and is overwhelmingly dependent on lobster, while regulations have restricted other fisheries. Since 1990, the number of vessels landing groundfish in Maine dropped from 350 to 70. At least 72 groundfish permits have been lost, and dramatic changes in management are imminent, leading Johnson to wonder, “How vulnerable are Maine’s fishing communities? What can be done to improve their resiliency to future change?” These are the questions that federal fisheries managers must ask when assessing the impact of new rules, yet too often they don’t have the right data to answer the questions. This project developed a participatory, place-based approach for assessing the vulnerability and resilience of Maine fishing communities, documenting threats and resources available to respond to those threats. To understand the forces driving vulnerability, Johnson and graduate students Cameron Thompson and Anna Henry worked with community stakeholders to identify opportunities and strategies for improving resilience of fishing communities.
Edward French, born in 1959, is a lifelong resident of Eastport, Maine, with a deep-rooted history in commercial fishing. His first involvement in the industry was as a crew member on a herring carrier, and he later ventured into tub trawling and scalloping on his own during the summer and fall seasons. In addition to his hands-on experience in the fisheries, French has also covered the industry for the local newspaper, Quoddy Tides. His insights into the community, its history, and its relationship with the fishing industry provide a unique perspective on the changes and challenges Eastport has faced over the years.
Scope and Content Note
This interview with Edward French, conducted by Anna Henry on October 7, 2011, as part of the University of Maine project, “Assessing Vulnerability and Resilience in Maine Fishing Communities,” provides a comprehensive look into the history, changes, and future of Eastport, Maine, particularly in relation to its fishing industry. French discusses his personal involvement in the fisheries, including handlining, tub trawling, lobstering, and scalloping, and his coverage of the industry for the Quoddy Tides newspaper. He shares his perspective on the community's attitude towards newcomers and the tension that sometimes arises between long-time residents and those who have recently moved in. French also addresses the changes in housing affordability in Eastport, attributing the increase in housing prices to the housing boom in the late '80s and more recently. He identifies the loss of fish processing as a significant challenge for the community, likening it to the struggles faced by other Maine communities that have lost natural resource-based industries. French shares his vision for the future of Eastport, predicting a continued struggle but also a shift towards a more creative economy that coexists with traditional industries like fisheries and tourism. He expresses his appreciation for the authenticity and independence of Eastport and its residents. The interview also covers the boom and bust cycles of Eastport, with French highlighting major projects and proposals that have shaped the community's history and attitudes, including shipping and shipbuilding, sardine packing, the Quoddy Dam tidal project, an oil refinery, a coal fire generating plant, and an LNG terminal. French discusses the representation and organization of commercial fishermen in Eastport, mentioning the Maine Lobstermen's Association and the Downeast Lobstermen's Association as examples. He also discusses the conflicts that sometimes arise between different fisheries, such as lobster fishing and scallop dragging, due to gear conflicts. French provides his perspective on the economic status of fishermen in Eastport, stating that full-time fishermen in robust fisheries like lobstering and scalloping have seen improvements in some ways. He contrasts this with the past when fisheries were almost a subsistence type of economy, helping families get through the winter. Overall, this interview provides a comprehensive and insightful look into the history, changes, and future of Eastport, Maine, particularly in relation to its fishing industry, through the eyes of a lifelong resident and active participant in the industry.
Please Note: The oral histories in this collection are protected by copyright and have been created for educational, research and personal use as described by the Fair Use Doctrine in the U.S. Copyright law. Please reach out Voices@noaa.gov to let us know how these interviews are being used in your research, project, exhibit, etc. The Voices staff can help provide other useful resources related to your inquiry.
The NOAA mission is to understand and predict changes in climate, weather, oceans, and coasts, to share that knowledge and information with others, and to conserve and manage coastal and marine ecosystems and resources. The Voices Oral History Archives offers public access to a wide range of accounts, including historical materials that are products of their particular times, and may contain offensive language or negative stereotypes.
Voices Oral History Archives does not verify the accuracy of materials submitted to us. The opinions expressed in the interviews are those of the interviewee only. The interviews here have been made available to the public only after the interviewer has confirmed that they have obtained consent.