Daniel R. Mulville

Location of Interview
Collection Name

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Oral Histories

Description

The interviews in this collection were selected from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) Oral History Program, which contains interviews with aerospace legends, analyses of key events, aerospace chronologies, and more. The interviews included here are those that relate specifically to NOAA's mission.

For more information and to explore the larger collection, visit NASA's Oral Histories.

Interviewer
Affiliation
Date of Interview
06-13-2013
Abstract

Daniel R. Mulville, a former Navy employee, embarked on a distinguished career at NASA in 1986 following the tragic Challenger accident. His tenure at NASA was marked by significant contributions to the agency's engineering and safety standards. As the Director of the Engineering Division in the Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, Mulville played a pivotal role in the development of NASA's spacecraft design and development standards. His efforts were instrumental in transitioning NASA from its proprietary quality control standards to the adoption of international standards, thereby harmonizing the agency's practices with global benchmarks. Mulville's influence extended beyond engineering standards. He was deeply involved in the establishment of agency-wide guidelines for program and project management. His insights were crucial in the context of national standards and the implementation of the metric system in NASA projects. As a proponent of effective communication, he underscored the necessity for NASA to enhance its storytelling, particularly in showcasing the achievements of the International Space Station and other significant projects. In his capacity as the Chief Engineer at NASA, Mulville provided leadership and oversight for engineering activities across the agency. He addressed critical safety concerns, such as misaligned welds on Space Shuttle high-pressure fuel pumps, and played a role in the International Space Station
program. His office was responsible for conducting independent assessments and reviews to ensure the technical readiness and reliability of various projects, including the development of Crew Return Vehicles. Mulville's tenure at NASA also saw him in the roles of Associate Deputy Administrator and Acting Administrator, where he navigated complex challenges such as budget constraints, program issues, and the International Space Station shortfall. His post-NASA career involved technical reviews and studies, including work on the Space Station Utilization study, spacecraft problems, and the Lunar Robotics Program. He also contributed to the understanding and mitigation of near-earth object (NEO) threats, advocating for increased funding to detect smaller asteroids. Throughout his career, Mulville demonstrated a steadfast commitment to advancing NASA's mission and ensuring the safety and reliability of its endeavors. His leadership and expertise left a lasting impact on the agency's engineering practices and its approach to addressing the myriad challenges of space exploration.

Scope and Content Note
This interview provides a comprehensive overview of Dan Mulville's career and contributions to NASA, highlighting his involvement in pivotal moments and projects within the agency. Mulville, who joined NASA in 1986 after a tenure with the Navy, played a significant role in the aftermath of the Challenger accident and was instrumental in shaping NASA's approach to spacecraft design and development standards as the Director of the Engineering Division in the Office of Safety and Mission Assurance. His advocacy for the adoption of national rather than NASA-unique standards underscores the importance of uniformity and collaboration in space exploration. The interview delves into the critical function of the Chief Engineer's Office at NASA, emphasizing its mandate to ensure engineering excellence across the agency. Mulville discusses the office's leadership in addressing safety issues, such as the Space Shuttle's faulty welds, and its evaluative role in various space programs, including the International Space Station and the Crew Return Vehicle. The Program Management Council's oversight and the Chief Engineer's independent assessments are highlighted as key to maintaining the reliability and safety of NASA's missions. Mulville reflects on his tenure as Associate Deputy Administrator and Acting Administrator, sharing insights into the evolution of commercial space transportation and the challenges of collaborating with commercial entities. He also touches on the impact of external events, such as the September 11th attacks, on NASA's operations. Furthermore, the interview covers Mulville's post-agency work, including technical reviews and studies on Space Station Utilization, spacecraft issues, the Lunar Robotics Program, and the mitigation of near-earth objects (NEOs). He discusses a study on NEOs that revealed the need for increased funding to detect smaller asteroids by 2020, as well as the challenges he faced while leading NASA's engineering organization. Overall, the interview encapsulates Mulville's appreciation for NASA's unique culture and achievements, offering a personal perspective on the agency's endeavors and the complexities of space exploration.


Please Note: The oral histories in this collection are protected by copyright and have been created for educational, research and personal use as described by the Fair Use Doctrine in the U.S. Copyright law. Please reach out  Voices@noaa.gov to let us know how these interviews are being used in your research, project, exhibit, etc.  The Voices staff can help provide other useful resources related to your inquiry. 

The NOAA mission is to understand and predict changes in climate, weather, oceans, and coasts, to share that knowledge and information with others, and to conserve and manage coastal and marine ecosystems and resources. The Voices Oral History Archives offers public access to a wide range of accounts, including historical materials that are products of their particular times, and may contain offensive language or negative stereotypes.

Voices Oral History Archives does not verify the accuracy of materials submitted to us. The opinions expressed in the interviews are those of the interviewee only. The interviews here have been made available to the public only after the interviewer has confirmed that they have obtained consent.